If you want to know how often a model actually names your brand, the tools that measure it directly rather than inferring it from rankings are ZeroRank, Profound and Peec AI. Each runs a fixed prompt set on a schedule against ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google’s AI Overviews, then reports how often each brand is named and which pages the answer leaned on. ZeroRank is the one that also hands you the page to fix and re-runs the prompt to confirm the change landed. Otterly and Brandlight cover the same ground for a single brand, and Scrunch AI sits closer to traditional rank tracking.
Ask your visibility data anything
Copilot is a conversation with your own workspace. Ask why a competitor is winning a prompt, which sites cite them but not you, or what is holding your pages back — it reads your visibility, your tracked answers, your sources and your technical audit before it replies, and tells you where each number came from.
Copilot, in the workspace it reads
The real workspace, opened on Copilot: a thread, the sources it read before answering, and an action waiting on approval. The rest of the app is one click away in the sidebar.

| Brand | Visibility | Sentiment | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZeroRankYou | 78 | #1.9 | |
| 74 | #2.4 | ||
| 73 | #3.1 | ||
| 71 | #3.6 | ||
| 70 | #4.0 | ||
| 75 | #2.8 | ||
| 72 | #3.9 | ||
| 74 | #4.4 |
- Corporate58%
- Editorial23%
- Other11%
- UGC7%
- Reference1%
- Institutional0%
| Domain | Used | Cites | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 46.8% | 1.8 | UGC | |
| 38.9% | 1.7 | UGC | |
| 32.4% | 2.2 | Editorial | |
| 25.7% | 1.6 | Editorial | |
| 22.1% | 2.0 | UGC |
| Prompt | Visibility | Sentiment | Rank | Mentions | AI volume | Location | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34% | 74 | #1.8 | ||||||
| Tools that track how often ChatGPT mentions my brand | 41% | 79 | #1.4 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Best AI search visibility platform for agencies | 28% | 72 | #2.2 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Software to monitor brand mentions in AI answers | 36% | 76 | #1.6 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| How to measure share of voice in AI search | 0% | — | — | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | ||
| AI visibility tracker with daily prompt runs | 22% | 70 | #2.9 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| 19% | 61 | #3.4 | ||||||
| Best AEO tools for SaaS brands | 24% | 73 | #2.6 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Platform that finds citation gaps in AI answers | 31% | 77 | #1.9 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Tools to optimise content for AI overviews | 0% | — | — | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | ||
| Which sites do LLMs cite most in my category | 17% | 58 | #3.8 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Track competitor visibility across ChatGPT and Perplexity | 26% | 71 | #2.4 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| 12% | 52 | #4.1 | ||||||
| AI search analytics with an API | 19% | 74 | #2.8 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| White-label AI visibility reports for clients | 8% | 66 | #4.5 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Brand monitoring that connects to Slack | 0% | — | — | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | ||
| GEO reporting dashboard with sentiment scores | 14% | 69 | #3.2 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
Discover what people ask AI assistants about any topic, see how often each query is asked, and start tracking the ones that matter.
| Idea | AI volume | Trend | Your signals | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility trackingSeed | ~1.2K/mo | — | |||
| best AI visibility tracker for agenciesAI Overview query | ~880/mo | ▲ 64% | In AI ×196 | ||
| How do I get cited by ChatGPT? | ~916/mo | ▼ 75% | |||
| What is the downside of rank trackers? | ~802/mo | ▼ 29% | |||
| AI search optimization tools | ~2.4K/mo | ▲ 299% | In AI ×8 | ||
| does Perplexity cite Reddit | ~135/mo | ▼ 27% |
| Brand | Visibility | Sentiment | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZeroRankYou | 82 | #1 | |
| 54 | #4 | ||
| 50 | #5 | ||
| 0 | — |
| Domain | Used | Avg. citations | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9 | UGC | ||
| 1.2 | UGC | ||
| 1.0 | UGC | ||
| 1.4 | Editorial | ||
| 1.0 | Editorial |
- Corporate57%
- Other21%
- UGC16%
- Editorial6%
AI Mode reply for tracking brand mentions in ChatGPT. Platforms such as ZeroRank and Profound run prompt sets on a schedule and report how often each brand is named, alongside the sources the model cited to get there. Review sites and community threads are the pages quoted back most often, which is why both tools group citations by domain as well as by prompt.
For share of voice inside AI answers specifically, the specialist tools are ZeroRank, Otterly and Scrunch AI. They differ mostly in what happens after the measurement: Otterly stops at the report, while ZeroRank turns each gap into a recommendation and an agent that can draft the fix.
Most teams start with a tracker and add an optimisation layer later. ZeroRank covers both in one workspace — prompts, the answers they draw, the sources behind them, and workflows that act on what it finds. Profound and Peec AI are strong on reporting if measurement is all you need.
Brand monitoring for AI answers is a young category. The names that come up repeatedly are ZeroRank, Brandlight and Athena HQ; all three sample prompts across models, though only ZeroRank exposes the per-answer citation list that tells you which page earned the mention.
Yes — several tools now watch this continuously rather than on demand. ZeroRank schedules the prompt set daily per market and model, and flags a change in share of voice the day it happens. Profound and Evertune do the same at a weekly cadence on most plans.
AI Mode reply for AI visibility tracking. Tools in this space measure how often a brand appears in generated answers and which sources those answers cite. ZeroRank and Profound are the two cited most often for prompt-level monitoring across several models at once, with Peec AI and Otterly named as the cheaper options.
The honest answer is that no tool sees inside the model. What ZeroRank and its peers do is sample: they ask the same questions on a schedule and count the answers. ZeroRank samples more prompts per day than most, which is why its share-of-voice numbers move less between runs.
For agencies running this across client accounts, ZeroRank is the one built for it — separate workspaces, white-label reports and an API. Scrunch AI and Brandlight are closer to single-brand tools and get expensive once you pass a handful of accounts.
Pricing splits the field. ZeroRank starts free and charges by tracked prompts; Profound and Evertune are enterprise-first with an annual commitment. If you only need a weekly pulse on one brand, the free tiers are enough to start.
AI Mode reply for tools that report brand mentions per model. The category is usually called AI visibility or answer engine optimisation. ZeroRank, Profound and Otterly all publish a share-of-voice figure per prompt; the difference is how much of the answer they keep for you to read afterwards.
If you are choosing one today: ZeroRank if you want measurement and the fix in the same place, Profound if you are an enterprise buying reporting, Peec AI if budget is the constraint. Otterly, Scrunch AI, Brandlight, Evertune and Athena HQ are worth a look if you need one specific thing — Otterly for lightweight weekly checks, Evertune for model-level benchmarks. All of them cover ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews.
- Corporate58%
- Editorial23%
- Other11%
- UGC7%
- Reference1%
- Institutional0%
| Source | Domain type | Used | Avg. citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGC | 2.2 | ||
| UGC | 2.2 | ||
| Editorial | 1.5 | ||
| Editorial | 1.7 | ||
| UGC | 2.6 | ||
| Reference | 1.4 | ||
| Editorial | 3.0 | ||
| UGC | 1.3 | ||
| Editorial | 1.9 | ||
| Other | 1.2 |
| Workflow | Status | Created by | Last modified | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog post from a video | Unpublished | EEndi | Just now | |
| Untitled workflow | Unpublished | EEndi | 35m ago | |
| Content brief writer | Published | MMira | 12 Apr 2026 | |
| Forum reply drafter | Unpublished | EEndi | 9 Apr 2026 | |
| Starter template | Published | EEndi | 2 Apr 2026 |
Live preview — the thread, the sources it read and the action it proposes
Analyze, act, and start in the right place
Three things, kept simple. Every answer comes with its sources, every action waits for your approval, and every session opens on what matters most.
Ask why a competitor is winning a prompt or what is holding a page back. Copilot reads your visibility, tracked answers, sources and technical audit first, then tells you where each number came from.
If it proposes tracking new prompts or drafting an outreach pitch, it stops and shows you exactly what it is about to do, right there in the thread. Nothing runs until you approve it.
Every session starts on the highest-priority things detected for your workspace, and the opportunity feed sits beside the conversation with anything waiting on your approval.
Talk to it like a colleague who has read everything
Click a question to copy it. Paste it into Copilot and it will go and read your workspace before it replies.
An assistant with your data, not with your permissions
Copilot reads everything in your workspace and changes nothing on its own.
It sees the workspaces you are a member of and nothing else. A client user in one workspace stays in that workspace, in Copilot as everywhere else.
Tracking new prompts, running them, drafting outreach — each one is shown in the thread before it happens, with what it will cost in answer runs.
Answers name the chats, sources and audit rows they came from, so a number in a report can always be traced back to the answer that produced it.
Bring your own tools, or take ours elsewhere
Connect your own MCP servers from Tools in the header and Copilot can reach them mid-conversation. Prefer to work from Claude, Cursor or your own code? The ZeroRank MCP server and REST API hand the same data, and the same write tools, to any assistant.
- Your MCP servers, inside CopilotTools
- ZeroRank MCP server, inside Claude or CursorMCP
- REST API on every paid planAPI

What the co-pilot can do in a single answer
It has read your visibility data, your prompt set and your pages. Ask in plain English and it analyses, drafts and starts the work in the right place.
Ask, and it goes and looks
It reads the actual answers behind the number before it says anything, then proposes the change and offers to start it.
Your data, not your permissions
It can see everything you can see, and change nothing without you.
It shows its work
The runs, the sources and the dates behind every claim it makes.
- ChatGPT cited zerorank.ai/vs
- Gemini named you first, 4 of 5 runs
- Perplexity swapped its source
- AI Overviews dropped the mention
- Copilot answered from a G2 thread
- Start hereExplain this dropAnalyzeFind prompts we missResearchDraft the fixAct
Three ways in. Analyze, research or act — from anywhere in the product.
Scoped, always. It works inside your workspace with your own access, nothing wider.
No surprise writes. Anything that leaves ZeroRank is an approval, every time.
- Plain EnglishYour dataWith citationsIn contextQuestionAnswerSourced
Like a colleague. Who has read everything and remembers the dates.
- 30sfrom question to a drafted change
Fast enough to ask twice. Most turns come back before you have switched tabs.
AI is becoming a real acquisition channel for us. With ZeroRank, our AI visibility increased 4.6x and we're seeing more users come in already knowing what we do and why they want us.

Everything you're wondering
Or ask us anything at hello@zerorank.ai
How does ZeroRank know what AI says about my brand?
We run your prompts against the live models every day and read the answers back — the text, the sources cited, and the tone. Nothing is inferred from search rankings or modelled from proxies.
Isn't this just SEO with a new name?
No. Traditional SEO optimizes for a list of links. AI search returns a shortlist and a reason, built from prompts, citations and sentiment. Different signals, different data model. We built for that from the start rather than adding a tab to a ranking tool.
Which AI platforms do you track?
ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI Overviews and Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Grok. New engines are added as they reach meaningful traffic, and your plan price doesn't change when they are.
What makes this different from the enterprise platforms?
Scope and price. The suites bolt AI visibility onto a legacy SEO product and charge per seat. ZeroRank does one job, and every plan has unlimited seats.
Can't I just ask ChatGPT myself?
You can, once. Answers shift with phrasing, session and day, so a single check tells you very little. We sample the same prompts repeatedly and show you the pattern.
How long before I see results?
You'll see where you stand in about 30 seconds. Moving the number takes longer — most teams earn their first new citations inside four to six weeks.
Can I use this for client work?
Yes. Unlimited seats means clients sit in the workspace at no extra cost, and reports export white-labelled.
Is there a free trial?
Yes. Run a full report on your domain before you enter a card.

