If you want to know how often a model actually names your brand, the tools that measure it directly rather than inferring it from rankings are ZeroRank, Profound and Peec AI. Each runs a fixed prompt set on a schedule against ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google’s AI Overviews, then reports how often each brand is named and which pages the answer leaned on. ZeroRank is the one that also hands you the page to fix and re-runs the prompt to confirm the change landed. Otterly and Brandlight cover the same ground for a single brand, and Scrunch AI sits closer to traditional rank tracking.
Find the fix, not just the gap
ZeroRank reads the answer that skipped you, names the reason it skipped you, and writes the exact edit to your page. Then it re-runs the prompt to check the edit worked.
The sources an answer was built from
The real workspace, opened on Sources: which domains the models lean on for your category, how often each is used, and what type of page it is. This is the list a fix list is ranked against.

| Brand | Visibility | Sentiment | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZeroRankYou | 78 | #1.9 | |
| 74 | #2.4 | ||
| 73 | #3.1 | ||
| 71 | #3.6 | ||
| 70 | #4.0 | ||
| 75 | #2.8 | ||
| 72 | #3.9 | ||
| 74 | #4.4 |
- Corporate58%
- Editorial23%
- Other11%
- UGC7%
- Reference1%
- Institutional0%
| Domain | Used | Cites | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 46.8% | 1.8 | UGC | |
| 38.9% | 1.7 | UGC | |
| 32.4% | 2.2 | Editorial | |
| 25.7% | 1.6 | Editorial | |
| 22.1% | 2.0 | UGC |
| Prompt | Visibility | Sentiment | Rank | Mentions | AI volume | Location | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34% | 74 | #1.8 | ||||||
| Tools that track how often ChatGPT mentions my brand | 41% | 79 | #1.4 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Best AI search visibility platform for agencies | 28% | 72 | #2.2 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Software to monitor brand mentions in AI answers | 36% | 76 | #1.6 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| How to measure share of voice in AI search | 0% | — | — | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | ||
| AI visibility tracker with daily prompt runs | 22% | 70 | #2.9 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| 19% | 61 | #3.4 | ||||||
| Best AEO tools for SaaS brands | 24% | 73 | #2.6 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Platform that finds citation gaps in AI answers | 31% | 77 | #1.9 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Tools to optimise content for AI overviews | 0% | — | — | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | ||
| Which sites do LLMs cite most in my category | 17% | 58 | #3.8 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Track competitor visibility across ChatGPT and Perplexity | 26% | 71 | #2.4 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| 12% | 52 | #4.1 | ||||||
| AI search analytics with an API | 19% | 74 | #2.8 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| White-label AI visibility reports for clients | 8% | 66 | #4.5 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
| Brand monitoring that connects to Slack | 0% | — | — | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | ||
| GEO reporting dashboard with sentiment scores | 14% | 69 | #3.2 | ZeroRank | — | 🇺🇸 US | + Add tags | |
Discover what people ask AI assistants about any topic, see how often each query is asked, and start tracking the ones that matter.
| Idea | AI volume | Trend | Your signals | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility trackingSeed | ~1.2K/mo | — | |||
| best AI visibility tracker for agenciesAI Overview query | ~880/mo | ▲ 64% | In AI ×196 | ||
| How do I get cited by ChatGPT? | ~916/mo | ▼ 75% | |||
| What is the downside of rank trackers? | ~802/mo | ▼ 29% | |||
| AI search optimization tools | ~2.4K/mo | ▲ 299% | In AI ×8 | ||
| does Perplexity cite Reddit | ~135/mo | ▼ 27% |
| Brand | Visibility | Sentiment | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZeroRankYou | 82 | #1 | |
| 54 | #4 | ||
| 50 | #5 | ||
| 0 | — |
| Domain | Used | Avg. citations | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.9 | UGC | ||
| 1.2 | UGC | ||
| 1.0 | UGC | ||
| 1.4 | Editorial | ||
| 1.0 | Editorial |
- Corporate57%
- Other21%
- UGC16%
- Editorial6%
AI Mode reply for tracking brand mentions in ChatGPT. Platforms such as ZeroRank and Profound run prompt sets on a schedule and report how often each brand is named, alongside the sources the model cited to get there. Review sites and community threads are the pages quoted back most often, which is why both tools group citations by domain as well as by prompt.
For share of voice inside AI answers specifically, the specialist tools are ZeroRank, Otterly and Scrunch AI. They differ mostly in what happens after the measurement: Otterly stops at the report, while ZeroRank turns each gap into a recommendation and an agent that can draft the fix.
Most teams start with a tracker and add an optimisation layer later. ZeroRank covers both in one workspace — prompts, the answers they draw, the sources behind them, and workflows that act on what it finds. Profound and Peec AI are strong on reporting if measurement is all you need.
Brand monitoring for AI answers is a young category. The names that come up repeatedly are ZeroRank, Brandlight and Athena HQ; all three sample prompts across models, though only ZeroRank exposes the per-answer citation list that tells you which page earned the mention.
Yes — several tools now watch this continuously rather than on demand. ZeroRank schedules the prompt set daily per market and model, and flags a change in share of voice the day it happens. Profound and Evertune do the same at a weekly cadence on most plans.
AI Mode reply for AI visibility tracking. Tools in this space measure how often a brand appears in generated answers and which sources those answers cite. ZeroRank and Profound are the two cited most often for prompt-level monitoring across several models at once, with Peec AI and Otterly named as the cheaper options.
The honest answer is that no tool sees inside the model. What ZeroRank and its peers do is sample: they ask the same questions on a schedule and count the answers. ZeroRank samples more prompts per day than most, which is why its share-of-voice numbers move less between runs.
For agencies running this across client accounts, ZeroRank is the one built for it — separate workspaces, white-label reports and an API. Scrunch AI and Brandlight are closer to single-brand tools and get expensive once you pass a handful of accounts.
Pricing splits the field. ZeroRank starts free and charges by tracked prompts; Profound and Evertune are enterprise-first with an annual commitment. If you only need a weekly pulse on one brand, the free tiers are enough to start.
AI Mode reply for tools that report brand mentions per model. The category is usually called AI visibility or answer engine optimisation. ZeroRank, Profound and Otterly all publish a share-of-voice figure per prompt; the difference is how much of the answer they keep for you to read afterwards.
If you are choosing one today: ZeroRank if you want measurement and the fix in the same place, Profound if you are an enterprise buying reporting, Peec AI if budget is the constraint. Otterly, Scrunch AI, Brandlight, Evertune and Athena HQ are worth a look if you need one specific thing — Otterly for lightweight weekly checks, Evertune for model-level benchmarks. All of them cover ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews.
- Corporate58%
- Editorial23%
- Other11%
- UGC7%
- Reference1%
- Institutional0%
| Source | Domain type | Used | Avg. citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| UGC | 2.2 | ||
| UGC | 2.2 | ||
| Editorial | 1.5 | ||
| Editorial | 1.7 | ||
| UGC | 2.6 | ||
| Reference | 1.4 | ||
| Editorial | 3.0 | ||
| UGC | 1.3 | ||
| Editorial | 1.9 | ||
| Other | 1.2 |
| Workflow | Status | Created by | Last modified | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog post from a video | Unpublished | EEndi | Just now | |
| Untitled workflow | Unpublished | EEndi | 35m ago | |
| Content brief writer | Published | MMira | 12 Apr 2026 | |
| Forum reply drafter | Unpublished | EEndi | 9 Apr 2026 | |
| Starter template | Published | EEndi | 2 Apr 2026 |
Live preview — the sources behind the answers, and what they cite
An answer has four places to lose you
Absent is a symptom, not a cause. Every miss happens at one of four steps, and each step takes a completely different fix. ZeroRank names the step before it suggests anything.
The page was never reached. GPTBot took a 404 on /compare and ClaudeBot is disallowed in robots.txt. Nothing you write matters until the door opens.
The page is there and the question is yours, but no passage on it answers the question as asked. The model looked, found nothing liftable, moved on.
Your wording shaped the answer and a review site got the link. You paid for the research and someone else collects the click.
You are in the shortlist as the cheap one, or the one missing a feature you shipped last quarter. Being named is not the win.
Filed by who can fix them, ranked by what they move
Every cause lands in one of three lanes — off-page, on-page, technical — with the prompts it touches, the visibility it should return and how long it takes to ship. Real pages and real URLs, not a checklist.
Where the answer's sources come from. Outreach plays with the exact page to pitch, the thread to answer, the listing to correct.
- Get listed on the G2 category AI keeps citing+3 pts
- Answer the r/SEO thread cited in 4 prompts+2 pts
- Correct the category listing on a review site+3 pts
Content modelled on the pages AI actually cites, with the topics and phrases it lifts and the passage your page is missing.
- Publish a comparison page for the category+12 pts
- Rewrite the opening claim with numbers+6 pts
- Add an FAQ block for the 4 missing prompts+4 pts
An audit of how AI-ready your site is: llms.txt, robots.txt, sitemap, schema, Open Graph, canonicals, author signals and page speed.
- Add Product schema on /pricing+7 pts
- Allow GPTBot on /docs/*+4 pts
- Fix the 404 GPTBot hits on /compare+5 pts
| # | Fix | Prompts hit | Est. gain | Effort | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Publish a comparison page/compare — new on-page | 6 prompts | +12 pts | 2 h | 78% |
| 02 | Add Product schema/pricing — markup technical | 9 prompts | +7 pts | 20 min | 85% |
| 03 | Rewrite the opening claim with numbers/product/tracking — copy on-page | 4 prompts | +6 pts | 15 min | 64% |
| 04 | Allow GPTBot on /docs/*robots.txt — access technical | 11 prompts | +4 pts | 5 min | 91% |
| 05 | Correct the category listingthird-party — outreach off-page | 3 prompts | +3 pts | external | 41% |
Confidence is how often the same fix moved the same kind of prompt across the accounts we track. Anything under 50% is offered as an experiment, not a recommendation.
It writes the change, not a checklist
Pick a fix and Copilot drafts the change against your real page — the sentence, the missing section, the schema block — as a diff you approve or reject in the conversation. Nothing ships until you say so.
From brief to published page, scored for AI
When the fix is a page you don't have yet, ZeroRank writes it: a brief built from the prompts you are missing, a full draft, and an optimizer for the pages you already own — each scored live for how likely a model is to lift it.
Pick the prompts you are missing and get a brief built from the pages AI already cites for them, then a full draft in your workspace's language.
Paste a URL. The optimizer compares it with the top cited pages for the prompt and rewrites the passages that keep it from being quoted.
Drafts go through an approval step, then push straight to WordPress, Webflow or your CMS. No copy-pasting between tabs.
A fix isn't finished when it ships
ZeroRank keeps running the prompt that failed and shows the same answer before and after, so the win is something you can put in a report.
Same prompt, same model, same daily schedule. The only thing that changed is the two fixes shipped on 2 September.
Put it on a schedule, or in your own stack
Set it once. Workflows watch every tracked prompt and run the plays above on a schedule or on a trigger, then brief whoever ships the fix.
Explore workflows MCP & REST APIOr pull the fix list into your own stackEvery paid plan includes the API: the full answer behind any chat, with every URL it cited. The MCP server hands the same data, and the same write tools, to Claude, Cursor or any assistant.
Read the docsWhat a fix list is actually made of
Four places an answer can lose you, one ranked list of changes, a draft written against your real page — and the same prompt run again afterwards to see whether it worked.
The prompt that failed, run again
Before and after are the same question, on the same model, on the same schedule, with the day the fix shipped pinned to the line. That is the only proof that counts.
It names the reason
Crawl, passage, citation or framing — each one has a different fix.
A diff, not a checklist
The exact edit against your live page. Nothing publishes until you approve it.
Diff on /pricing: one paragraph, one FAQ schema block.
DiscardApprove- Ranked by reach1Rewrite the comparison table9 prompts2Add FAQ schema6 prompts3Get listed on the G2 category4 prompts
Ordered by what it moves. By the number of tracked prompts each change touches.
- AEO contentBriefReadyDraftScored 82Optimizer3 notes
Brief, draft, score. Written for how a model reads a page, not for a keyword density target.
Crawler-side too. robots.txt, llms.txt and what each AI crawler actually got back.
- From a gapDraftedApprovedLiveBriefPublishedScored
Brief to published. With WordPress or Webflow connected, the approved change ships itself.
A score that moves. The content score on the page, re-read after every edit.
AI is becoming a real acquisition channel for us. With ZeroRank, our AI visibility increased 4.6x and we're seeing more users come in already knowing what we do and why they want us.

Teams that stopped guessing
Real reviews from Trustpilot and G2, from teams who turned a fix list into a result.
Great experience with ZeroRank
I have been using ZeroRank for over 2 months now and it has been a great help to me and my agency. Using the platform has allowed me to track my Ai Visibility in at least 6 AI Engines, I can clearly see where my brand is ranking compared to my competitors and I can see what steps I need to take to outrank them.
Visibility tripled in 2 months for our small UK bead shop
We used ZeroRank to improve how AQ Beads UK appears in AI answers like ChatGPT and Claude. In just 2 months, our visibility went from 8% to 23% and our average rank improved from #3.1 to #2.0. The dashboard is straightforward, and the prompt tracking makes it clear what to improve.
A must-have for tracking brand visibility across major LLMs
It provides incredible visibility into how brands are positioned across major Large Language Models like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini. Being able to actively track, measure and optimize for GEO and AEO gives us a massive competitive advantage. It takes the guesswork out of AI visibility and replaces it with actionable data.
Early mover advantage
An essential tool for marketing agencies navigating GEO. ZeroRank AI has been a game-changer for our client reporting. The multi-brand workspaces keep everything organized, and the actionable recommendations help us optimize content that directly boosts our visibility over competitors in AI search results.
Very useful for tracking our visibility across AI platforms
Before using it, checking AI visibility meant manually testing prompts and trying to interpret the results ourselves. What I like most is that ZeroRank turns this into something much easier to monitor and measure. It helps us see where we are mentioned, which queries we perform well on, where competitors are stronger, and what areas we should improve in our GEO strategy.
Easy to use, fast results. We're getting more clients through ChatGPT
The Recommendations make it clear what we need to do to improve our presence in AI answers. Before, we tried different tools, but they were too complex to interpret the data and know what needs to get done. Our articles are ranking on the first page of Google and getting picked up by ChatGPT and AI Overviews. More clients are saying they found us in AI answers.
They treat their customers right
ZeroRank is a fairly new company that treats its customers right. Its AEO/GEO tool set is stellar as is and getting better. However, what impressed me the most is the onboarding experience and customer service. I booked two onboarding calls back-to-back on two different days, and each time I received friendly, efficient and clear help.
Easy to use, even without being deeply technical
I've found ZeroRank very easy to use and understand, even without being deeply technical in SEO. It gives me a much clearer picture of how my brand is appearing in AI search results and, more importantly, helps me understand what I can do to improve that visibility.
Showed me I was the most cited source and still not recommended
The Chats view shows you the actual answer each model gave, word for word, with the sources it cited. On my first run I found that my own website was the most cited source in my market, used in 63% of tracked answers, while my brand visibility in those same answers was 1%. The models were reading my site more than anyone else's and recommending a competitor. No rank tracker would have surfaced that.
Great tool for managing multiple websites
ZeroRank AI has been very useful for managing the SEO and AI visibility of our four websites from one place. I especially like the competitor tracking features. Being able to monitor our competitors, compare visibility and understand where they are performing better gives us valuable information to improve our own strategy.
A valuable tool for AI search optimization
The platform has helped me identify where my content is already being cited, uncover optimization opportunities, and measure progress as I build authority pages. I've also seen measurable improvements in visibility after acting on the recommendations.
Solid AI visibility tool, Copilot is the standout
Clean, intuitive UI. Doesn't feel bloated like most SaaS dashboards, and it tracks multiple brands 24/7 without me having to babysit it. Copilot is genuinely useful: it surfaces specific, actionable suggestions instead of generic "improve your content" advice. Support team is responsive.
Valuable for GEO presence
I find ZeroRank AI incredibly valuable for optimizing my GEO presence in AI tools like ChatGPT and Google Gemini. The sources and AI traffic tools are great, providing detailed reports on visibility, rank, positive sentiment, and prompt performance.
Simple, insightful way to track brand visibility across AI search
AI search visibility is still quite a new area, but ZeroRank presents the information in a way that makes sense without needing to be an SEO expert. It is not just about showing a score or a ranking. It gives me a better understanding of why my brand may or may not be appearing, which makes it easier to take practical steps to improve.
Everything you're wondering
Or ask us anything at hello@zerorank.ai
Does ZeroRank change my website for me?
Only when you tell it to. Copilot drafts the change as a diff against your page — the sentence, the section, the schema block — and nothing is published until you approve it. With WordPress or Webflow connected it pushes the approved change for you; otherwise you get the exact edit to paste.
Do I have to use your wording?
No. The draft exists so you have something concrete to argue with. Most teams keep the structure and the facts and rewrite the voice, which is the right way round.
Isn't this just SEO advice with new labels?
Some fixes overlap — a 404 is a 404. But most of the list is about how a model reads a page: whether a passage answers the question as asked, whether a claim carries a number it can quote, whether the source that got the link was yours. Ranking tools do not measure any of that.
How do you know a fix caused the change?
We keep running the prompt that failed. The before and after are the same question, on the same model, on the same schedule, shown side by side — with the day the fix shipped pinned to the timeline.
What if the problem isn't on my site at all?
Then the fix is off-page, and the list says so: the review site to get listed on, the thread AI keeps citing, the category page that describes you wrong. You get the exact URL and what to change on it, not a note to build authority.
Do I need a developer?
For most fixes, no. Copy and structure changes are yours to approve and paste. Schema and robots.txt edits are a few lines, and the diff shows exactly what goes where, so whoever owns the site can ship them in minutes.
How long before an answer changes?
Technical fixes are picked up on the next crawl, usually within days. Content fixes take longer because the model has to fetch and re-weigh the page — most teams see the first answer move inside two to four weeks.
Can I use this for client work?
Yes. Fix lists live in each client's workspace, reports export white-labelled, and the before-and-after view was built for exactly that conversation.
Is there a free trial?
Yes. Run a full report on your domain before you enter a card.

